Tags |
|
|
Links |
|
|
Digg it UP - Diagnosis of Mental Disorders by Clinical Psychologists - Is it Unethical?
Direct response marketing solicits a direct response from your customers, according to Texas marketing consultants. Instead of putting your product out on the web, on store shelves, or in a regular advertisement, you introduce your product to them through TV, radio, or print mediums and give them a way to respond and buy right that moment.For Texas marketing agencies and businesses, direct response marketing provides a way to generate interest and demand for your product or service as well as rake in profits from sales. Texas marketing consultants implement direct response in businesses every day. Consulting with a Texas marketing agency can teach you how to implement it in yours.But the question most people have about direct response marketin
You can read about the future DSM-V at the url listed below.
How are psychiatric disorders discovered if they're not scientific?
They aren't discovered...most are created. Committees of physicians (and a few non-physicians) decide...intuitively...what a mental disorder is.
For example...if a child is no good at arithmetic...she may be diagnosed with 315.1 Mathematics Disorder. Difficulty with arithmetic may be due to lack of interest. But that's not a disorder. Or it may be due to neurological problems. Which makes it a genuine medical issue...not an arbitrary psychiatric disorder.
What should I do?
You can remember that psychologists are required to practice from established scientific knowledge. They must have your informed consent to share information...such as a diagnosis. So...lacking those things...you should have concerns in this age of massive government and corporate data bases.
And you should raise any concerns about the unethics of diagnosing mental disorders with your psychologist or oth
You can get a payday loan with quick approval in one hour from lenders that operate online in the Internet. You can submit your loan application online with details of your name, address, social security number, driver’s license, employer, bank account, and some references. If you have a full-time job and get paid on a regular basis then you are likely to get an approval and the cash can be deposited into your bank account in one hour.The idea of payday loan is for emergencies only, that too, for temporary financial emergencies. It might make a wise financial decision if you decide to go for the payday loan to get your finances back on track. However, before you go for the same, it is always prudent to look into certain factors.For example, it
Clinical psychology has its roots in psychometrics...the scientific measurement of mental functions. The earliest and most commonly known example of this is IQ testing.
For a Ph.D. in clinical psychology...students had to know and use the scientific literature...then to design and carry out publishable scientific research.
If they couldn't...it didn't matter how caring they were in the clinic. They didn't get a Ph.D. because the Code of Ethics For Psychologists -- Standard 2.04 says clearly...
Psychologists' work is based upon established scientific...knowledge of the discipline.
And the 'disorders' in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)...the diagnostic bible...are not determined by scientific investigation. Scientific knowledge is missing in the diagnostic practice of clinical psychology.
A clinical psychologist diagnoses a 'disorder' by matching symptoms to descriptions in the DSM. Good science requires a standard of what's normal before you can decide what is abnormal. But normal and disordered are never defined to differentiate them. So the extent of any 'disorder' can't be measured.
Despite its requirement to be scientific in its activities...the profession became 'medicalized' and adopted the procedures and the jargon of psychiatry -- which has never claimed to be a scientific discipline. It uses borrowed terms like...mental health...psychotherapy...psychopathology...psychiatric diagnosis. And it often relies on medication to manage symptoms in patients.
Why would psychologists use unethical methods?
Unfortunately the incentives...or pressures...are great for psychologists to use unvalidated diagnoses. Insurance companies...who pay psychologists...and the courts...that use them as expert witnesses...put great emphasis on diagnosis of mental disorder.
How could this affect me?
It wouldn't be such a serious matter...except a diagnosis of psychiatric disorder can have unexpected negative consequences in people's lives. When they don't know who uses diagnostic data or how...people even can lose their liberty based on unvalidated disorders.
If you see a clinical psychologist and you use insurance to pay for psychotherapy...a diagnosis is usually required...and may legally be shared with the insurer's affiliated companies.
This data sharing may have negative results (e.g., denial of employment)...which the therapist may not have explored with you. If not...then your agreement to put diagnostic data on the insurance form was not informed consent.
However, the Code of Ethics For Psychologists requires informed consent to share information (Standard 3.10) by discussing...
1. the involvement of third parties (e.g., an insurance company or credit card company and their affiliates) and limits of confidentiality. (Standard 10.01).
2. by discussing the foreseeable uses of the information generated through their psychological activities. (Standard 4.02)
How do I know psychiatric diagnosis isn't scientific?
With the DSM-III the American Psychiatric Association tried to validate the psychiatric diagnosis of 'disorders'...using scientific methods to answer the question: Would clinicians...independently evaluating the same symptoms...arrive at the same diagnosis?
The results were discouraging. Clinician agreement was very variable. This makes almost all mental health diagnoses arbitrary. But they are put in medical records as facts.
And this arbitrariness infects the next edition of the manual (DSM-V). The physicians candidly assert they may never establish the scientific validity of these 'disorders'...
Limitations in the current diagnostic paradigm...embodied in the currentDSM-IV...suggest that future research efforts...exclusively focused on
refining the DSM-defined syndromes...may never be successful...in
uncovering their underlying [causes].
So, the 'disorders' are...and will remain scientifically unreliable opinion.
You can read about the future DSM-V at the url listed below.
How are psychiatric disorders discovered if they're not scientific?
They aren't discovered...most are created. Committees of physicians (and a few non-physicians) decide...intuitively...what a mental disorder is.
For example...if a child is no good at arithmetic...she may be diagnosed with 315.1 Mathematics Disorder. Difficulty with arithmetic may be due to lack of interest. But that's not a disorder. Or it may be due to neurological problems. Which makes it a genuine medical issue...not an arbitrary psychiatric disorder.
What should I do?
You can remember that psychologists are required to practice from established scientific knowledge. They must have your informed consent to share information...such as a diagnosis. So...lacking those things...you should have concerns in this age of massive government and corporate data bases.
And you should raise any concerns about the unethics of diagnosing mental disorders with your psychologist or othe
Pornography has snuck into our homes like Satan did with Eve in the Garden of Eden, tempting even the purest of heart. Some people have never thought about looking at porn before they had a computer, but now it somehow repeatedly gets in their view, and oops it happens.There are a few really bad apples out there that revel and delight in tossing immoral imagery into our faces. Whether we read about these lusty desires in our Spam email or see it on popup banners, we’ve all come face to face with it through our computer. Most of us don’t think twice about deleting porn from our email and in fact, we try to get popup blocker to stop the harassing banner ads.Since porn is tossed out recklessly everyday in front of our face, eventually someone is
Despite its requirement to be scientific in its activities...the profession became 'medicalized' and adopted the procedures and the jargon of psychiatry -- which has never claimed to be a scientific discipline. It uses borrowed terms like...mental health...psychotherapy...psychopathology...psychiatric diagnosis. And it often relies on medication to manage symptoms in patients.
Why would psychologists use unethical methods?
Unfortunately the incentives...or pressures...are great for psychologists to use unvalidated diagnoses. Insurance companies...who pay psychologists...and the courts...that use them as expert witnesses...put great emphasis on diagnosis of mental disorder.
How could this affect me?
It wouldn't be such a serious matter...except a diagnosis of psychiatric disorder can have unexpected negative consequences in people's lives. When they don't know who uses diagnostic data or how...people even can lose their liberty based on unvalidated disorders.
If you see a clinical psychologist and you use insurance to pay for psychotherapy...a diagnosis is usually required...and may legally be shared with the insurer's affiliated companies.
This data sharing may have negative results (e.g., denial of employment)...which the therapist may not have explored with you. If not...then your agreement to put diagnostic data on the insurance form was not informed consent.
However, the Code of Ethics For Psychologists requires informed consent to share information (Standard 3.10) by discussing...
1. the involvement of third parties (e.g., an insurance company or credit card company and their affiliates) and limits of confidentiality. (Standard 10.01).
2. by discussing the foreseeable uses of the information generated through their psychological activities. (Standard 4.02)
How do I know psychiatric diagnosis isn't scientific?
With the DSM-III the American Psychiatric Association tried to validate the psychiatric diagnosis of 'disorders'...using scientific methods to answer the question: Would clinicians...independently evaluating the same symptoms...arrive at the same diagnosis?
The results were discouraging. Clinician agreement was very variable. This makes almost all mental health diagnoses arbitrary. But they are put in medical records as facts.
And this arbitrariness infects the next edition of the manual (DSM-V). The physicians candidly assert they may never establish the scientific validity of these 'disorders'...
Limitations in the current diagnostic paradigm...embodied in the currentDSM-IV...suggest that future research efforts...exclusively focused on
refining the DSM-defined syndromes...may never be successful...in
uncovering their underlying [causes].
So, the 'disorders' are...and will remain scientifically unreliable opinion.
You can read about the future DSM-V at the url listed below.
How are psychiatric disorders discovered if they're not scientific?
They aren't discovered...most are created. Committees of physicians (and a few non-physicians) decide...intuitively...what a mental disorder is.
For example...if a child is no good at arithmetic...she may be diagnosed with 315.1 Mathematics Disorder. Difficulty with arithmetic may be due to lack of interest. But that's not a disorder. Or it may be due to neurological problems. Which makes it a genuine medical issue...not an arbitrary psychiatric disorder.
What should I do?
You can remember that psychologists are required to practice from established scientific knowledge. They must have your informed consent to share information...such as a diagnosis. So...lacking those things...you should have concerns in this age of massive government and corporate data bases.
And you should raise any concerns about the unethics of diagnosing mental disorders with your psychologist or oth
The majority of small business owners rely on only 2-3 marketing strategies for pulling potential customers within their grasp. However, the fact is that "Caffeine Marketing" is about encompassing all possible marketing resources available and gaining a profit from it. Here are a few tactics for gaining more customers and referrals:1) Referrals: The key to productive referral business is a proactive approach. You cannot sit back with a good image and expect that business will be driven in. Never assume that you current clients or customers will refer you. Ask them for a referral. Send out business gifts and thank you cards to current clients to help smack your companies name back in their mind. People will usually not accept something for free. Espec
If you see a clinical psychologist and you use insurance to pay for psychotherapy...a diagnosis is usually required...and may legally be shared with the insurer's affiliated companies.
This data sharing may have negative results (e.g., denial of employment)...which the therapist may not have explored with you. If not...then your agreement to put diagnostic data on the insurance form was not informed consent.
However, the Code of Ethics For Psychologists requires informed consent to share information (Standard 3.10) by discussing...
1. the involvement of third parties (e.g., an insurance company or credit card company and their affiliates) and limits of confidentiality. (Standard 10.01).
2. by discussing the foreseeable uses of the information generated through their psychological activities. (Standard 4.02)
How do I know psychiatric diagnosis isn't scientific?
With the DSM-III the American Psychiatric Association tried to validate the psychiatric diagnosis of 'disorders'...using scientific methods to answer the question: Would clinicians...independently evaluating the same symptoms...arrive at the same diagnosis?
The results were discouraging. Clinician agreement was very variable. This makes almost all mental health diagnoses arbitrary. But they are put in medical records as facts.
And this arbitrariness infects the next edition of the manual (DSM-V). The physicians candidly assert they may never establish the scientific validity of these 'disorders'...
Limitations in the current diagnostic paradigm...embodied in the currentDSM-IV...suggest that future research efforts...exclusively focused on
refining the DSM-defined syndromes...may never be successful...in
uncovering their underlying [causes].
So, the 'disorders' are...and will remain scientifically unreliable opinion.
You can read about the future DSM-V at the url listed below.
How are psychiatric disorders discovered if they're not scientific?
They aren't discovered...most are created. Committees of physicians (and a few non-physicians) decide...intuitively...what a mental disorder is.
For example...if a child is no good at arithmetic...she may be diagnosed with 315.1 Mathematics Disorder. Difficulty with arithmetic may be due to lack of interest. But that's not a disorder. Or it may be due to neurological problems. Which makes it a genuine medical issue...not an arbitrary psychiatric disorder.
What should I do?
You can remember that psychologists are required to practice from established scientific knowledge. They must have your informed consent to share information...such as a diagnosis. So...lacking those things...you should have concerns in this age of massive government and corporate data bases.
And you should raise any concerns about the unethics of diagnosing mental disorders with your psychologist or oth
Search engine optimization, a long time friend of website architects, affiliates and Internet marketers of many different levels of skill and experience. Of primary focus is how relevant is your website to visitors who begin their search via the major search engines?If your traffic is generated from a large variety of sources and your site is well written you could feel confident you’ll attract thousands of links and favorable treatment by the search engines, especially the prize of the game, namely Google.Don’t make the mistake made by spammers and the like and think you can manufacture websites by the hundreds and cross link and duplicate and make your website a star. While you will have a measure of temporary success if you are not gene
How do I know psychiatric diagnosis isn't scientific?
With the DSM-III the American Psychiatric Association tried to validate the psychiatric diagnosis of 'disorders'...using scientific methods to answer the question: Would clinicians...independently evaluating the same symptoms...arrive at the same diagnosis?
The results were discouraging. Clinician agreement was very variable. This makes almost all mental health diagnoses arbitrary. But they are put in medical records as facts.
And this arbitrariness infects the next edition of the manual (DSM-V). The physicians candidly assert they may never establish the scientific validity of these 'disorders'...
Limitations in the current diagnostic paradigm...embodied in the currentDSM-IV...suggest that future research efforts...exclusively focused on
refining the DSM-defined syndromes...may never be successful...in
uncovering their underlying [causes].
So, the 'disorders' are...and will remain scientifically unreliable opinion.
You can read about the future DSM-V at the url listed below.
How are psychiatric disorders discovered if they're not scientific?
They aren't discovered...most are created. Committees of physicians (and a few non-physicians) decide...intuitively...what a mental disorder is.
For example...if a child is no good at arithmetic...she may be diagnosed with 315.1 Mathematics Disorder. Difficulty with arithmetic may be due to lack of interest. But that's not a disorder. Or it may be due to neurological problems. Which makes it a genuine medical issue...not an arbitrary psychiatric disorder.
What should I do?
You can remember that psychologists are required to practice from established scientific knowledge. They must have your informed consent to share information...such as a diagnosis. So...lacking those things...you should have concerns in this age of massive government and corporate data bases.
And you should raise any concerns about the unethics of diagnosing mental disorders with your psychologist or oth
Recently I had a guy friend who asked me this very strange question. He told me that he had a conversation with a woman that he really likes at first glance, and the conversation went well at the beginning. But after he had asked for her name, and got it, she does not ask for his name throughout the conversation. So does this means that she is not interested in my friend?From my point of view, she MIGHT be not interested in him, as if a woman is interested in a man, she will tend to ask for his name, isn’t it? But this is not the most important part of the question. Actually it does not matter whether the woman likes you or not in the beginning. The only thing that matters is whether or not she feels that powerful, magical, all-important emotion ca
You can read about the future DSM-V at the url listed below.
How are psychiatric disorders discovered if they're not scientific?
They aren't discovered...most are created. Committees of physicians (and a few non-physicians) decide...intuitively...what a mental disorder is.
For example...if a child is no good at arithmetic...she may be diagnosed with 315.1 Mathematics Disorder. Difficulty with arithmetic may be due to lack of interest. But that's not a disorder. Or it may be due to neurological problems. Which makes it a genuine medical issue...not an arbitrary psychiatric disorder.
What should I do?
You can remember that psychologists are required to practice from established scientific knowledge. They must have your informed consent to share information...such as a diagnosis. So...lacking those things...you should have concerns in this age of massive government and corporate data bases.
And you should raise any concerns about the unethics of diagnosing mental disorders with your psychologist or other therapist. But first know what their ethical requirements are. The url for psychologists is below. For other professions just type into a search engine "ethics for..." and add the name of the profession.
If you and your clinical psychologist haven't discussed these things...which might make you decide not to use insurance benefits...your relationship may be on vague ethical grounds...which are inadequate to protect you...the consumer...from unwanted consequences.
Can I still see a psychologist if I don't want a psychiatric diagnosis?
Of course. It's very doable. And I'll cover how in another article.
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
<a href="http://www.diggitup.net/article/222055/diggitup-Diagnosis-of-Mental-Disorders-by-Clinical-Psychologists--Is-it-Unethical.html">Diagnosis of Mental Disorders by Clinical Psychologists - Is it Unethical?</a>
BB link (for phorums):
[url=http://www.diggitup.net/article/222055/diggitup-Diagnosis-of-Mental-Disorders-by-Clinical-Psychologists--Is-it-Unethical.html]Diagnosis of Mental Disorders by Clinical Psychologists - Is it Unethical?[/url]
Related Articles:
Your Ghostwriting Business: Setting Up Your Office
Spyware Can Cause You And Your System Irreparable Damage
Bookmark it:
|