Tags |
|
|
Links |
|
|
Digg it UP - Understanding The Psychological Autopsy
Emails have gotten a lot of attention over the past several years and have been credited as being an effective, low cost way of reaching new customers. Unfortunately, the growth of spam emails has effectively crowded out legitimate sales pitches. That is why a mass mailing campaign through the post office is still an effective and fairly inexpensive way to help you generate mortgage leads. Here are a few tips to keep in mind as you put together your direc
While there is certainly evidence to support the validity of psychological autopsies per se e.g. Brent et al (1993), it also needs to be recognised that in general, the term psychological autopsy is not particularly well defined nor standardised for operational use.
One major concern is that there does not appear to be systematic guidelines in place regarding training and best practice. Another, is that depending on the nature of the case under review, the person carrying out the psychological autopsy may no
You bet it is. Whether you want to borrow millions or only thousands; whether you've got the greatest idea of the 21st century or whether you just want to start up a small home based business, you need a Business Plan. One of the great myths is that you only need a Business Plan if you are going to borrow money from a bank. Not so. To go into any business requires a decision by you to do it. The Business Plan will help that decision. It is first and foremo
There are a number of reasons why it might be appropriate to undertake a psychological autopsy, however, the most common is to assist in determining nature of death.
Estimates suggest that in up to 20% of cases presented to a medical examiner/coroner the precise mode of death is unclear. A psychological autopsy can help address this ambiguity and establish whether death was as a result of natural causes, suicide, accident or murder.
Methodology
Within the context of a forensic investigation a psychological autopsy is employed as a data collection tool. The most common source being interview data obtained from the family and friends of the deceased.
Obtaining the medical history of the deceased is also a central component of the psychological autopsy. Interviewing the doctor of the deceased and/or examining medical records is, therefore another important data collection source.
The nature of the information collected would usually include the following:
Biographical information (age, marital status, occupation).
personal information (relationships, lifestyle, alcohol/drug use, sources of stress).
Secondary information (family history, police records, diaries).
It's important to note that as with most data collection protocols conducted within a psychological framework, different methodological approaches exist. A useful way to think of this is in terms of means to an end.
The end is by and large the same i.e. it is hoped that collectively, information obtained will as Berman & Litman (1993) describe result in a:
'Postdictive analysis yielding an opinion giving a logical understanding of the relationship between the deceased and the events and behaviors that preceded the death'.
The means by which you reach this end can, however, differ slightly, for example, the clinical approach Vs the equivocal death analysis approach favored by FBI.
Validity
While there is certainly evidence to support the validity of psychological autopsies per se e.g. Brent et al (1993), it also needs to be recognised that in general, the term psychological autopsy is not particularly well defined nor standardised for operational use.
One major concern is that there does not appear to be systematic guidelines in place regarding training and best practice. Another, is that depending on the nature of the case under review, the person carrying out the psychological autopsy may no
These days subcontracting, especially in IT, became very common. While I don’t say subcontracting is always a bad thing, it can’t be negated that sometimes it fails. Why is it so? I have several examples to share.CredibilityWe outsourced development of a piece of our proprietary application framework. Guys who took the project were considered as gurus but there were some problems with meeting deadlines by them earlier. A risk
Methodology
Within the context of a forensic investigation a psychological autopsy is employed as a data collection tool. The most common source being interview data obtained from the family and friends of the deceased.
Obtaining the medical history of the deceased is also a central component of the psychological autopsy. Interviewing the doctor of the deceased and/or examining medical records is, therefore another important data collection source.
The nature of the information collected would usually include the following:
Biographical information (age, marital status, occupation).
personal information (relationships, lifestyle, alcohol/drug use, sources of stress).
Secondary information (family history, police records, diaries).
It's important to note that as with most data collection protocols conducted within a psychological framework, different methodological approaches exist. A useful way to think of this is in terms of means to an end.
The end is by and large the same i.e. it is hoped that collectively, information obtained will as Berman & Litman (1993) describe result in a:
'Postdictive analysis yielding an opinion giving a logical understanding of the relationship between the deceased and the events and behaviors that preceded the death'.
The means by which you reach this end can, however, differ slightly, for example, the clinical approach Vs the equivocal death analysis approach favored by FBI.
Validity
While there is certainly evidence to support the validity of psychological autopsies per se e.g. Brent et al (1993), it also needs to be recognised that in general, the term psychological autopsy is not particularly well defined nor standardised for operational use.
One major concern is that there does not appear to be systematic guidelines in place regarding training and best practice. Another, is that depending on the nature of the case under review, the person carrying out the psychological autopsy may no
According to Wikipedia, the definition for the word tagline is: “a variant of a branding slogan typically used in marketing materials and advertising. The idea behind the concept is to create a memorable phrase that will sum up the tone and premise of a brand or product (like a film), or to reinforce the audience's memory of a product. Some taglines are successful enough to warrant inclusion in popular culture, often becoming snowclones.” I’m not going to
The nature of the information collected would usually include the following:
Biographical information (age, marital status, occupation).
personal information (relationships, lifestyle, alcohol/drug use, sources of stress).
Secondary information (family history, police records, diaries).
It's important to note that as with most data collection protocols conducted within a psychological framework, different methodological approaches exist. A useful way to think of this is in terms of means to an end.
The end is by and large the same i.e. it is hoped that collectively, information obtained will as Berman & Litman (1993) describe result in a:
'Postdictive analysis yielding an opinion giving a logical understanding of the relationship between the deceased and the events and behaviors that preceded the death'.
The means by which you reach this end can, however, differ slightly, for example, the clinical approach Vs the equivocal death analysis approach favored by FBI.
Validity
While there is certainly evidence to support the validity of psychological autopsies per se e.g. Brent et al (1993), it also needs to be recognised that in general, the term psychological autopsy is not particularly well defined nor standardised for operational use.
One major concern is that there does not appear to be systematic guidelines in place regarding training and best practice. Another, is that depending on the nature of the case under review, the person carrying out the psychological autopsy may no
Keywords make the search engine world go 'round. If you get most of your traffic from search engines, then targeting the right keywords should be central to your promotion strategy. To get the right keywords, you have to look at them from a search engine perspective.The first step in the process is to build up a large list of keywords related to your site. You can start out by simply thinking like your potential visitors and listing what they wo
The end is by and large the same i.e. it is hoped that collectively, information obtained will as Berman & Litman (1993) describe result in a:
'Postdictive analysis yielding an opinion giving a logical understanding of the relationship between the deceased and the events and behaviors that preceded the death'.
The means by which you reach this end can, however, differ slightly, for example, the clinical approach Vs the equivocal death analysis approach favored by FBI.
Validity
While there is certainly evidence to support the validity of psychological autopsies per se e.g. Brent et al (1993), it also needs to be recognised that in general, the term psychological autopsy is not particularly well defined nor standardised for operational use.
One major concern is that there does not appear to be systematic guidelines in place regarding training and best practice. Another, is that depending on the nature of the case under review, the person carrying out the psychological autopsy may no
It is 2006, and the San Diego real estate market has officially shifted to a buyers market. To sell you home at the price you want and in a timely fashion, you will need to enhance your homes features and stage your home to attract the highest quality of buyers. Potential buyers will compare your home to all others they see, so make sure it is as attractive as possible and unforgettable.Follow these easy and affordable 29 steps before putting your h
While there is certainly evidence to support the validity of psychological autopsies per se e.g. Brent et al (1993), it also needs to be recognised that in general, the term psychological autopsy is not particularly well defined nor standardised for operational use.
One major concern is that there does not appear to be systematic guidelines in place regarding training and best practice. Another, is that depending on the nature of the case under review, the person carrying out the psychological autopsy may not have the depth of forensic knowledge required to help inform the cause of death e.g. blood splatter analysis.
It is for these reasons that it is probably sensible to view the psychological autopsy as just one of the many investigative tools available within a cause of death investigation.
If you would like to find out more about psychological autopsies and other fascinating topics within forensic psychology, you can do so by visiting
http://www.all-about-forensic-psychology.com/
If you would like to read more information from the world of forensic psychology you can subscribe to my free newsletter. Regular features include an articles and links section, conference listings, news from the field and study guide.
http://www.all-about-forensic-psychology.com/forensic-psychology-newsletter.html
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
<a href="http://www.diggitup.net/article/222298/diggitup-Understanding-The-Psychological-Autopsy.html">Understanding The Psychological Autopsy</a>
BB link (for phorums):
[url=http://www.diggitup.net/article/222298/diggitup-Understanding-The-Psychological-Autopsy.html]Understanding The Psychological Autopsy[/url]
Related Articles:
Business Cards - Advertising Tools
101 Muscular Ways to Get More Targeted Traffic to Your Sites / Blogs Today!
Bookmark it:
|