backfired due to the media and was probably a less than tactful event, similar perhaps to the Monica Lewinsky event, also far less than tactful and quite frankly none of my business. May I ask what your point is here? There is a section on this website which discusses prison abuse. Yet you are making statements in anonymity and these statements of yours are Well there sure is a whole lot of discussion these days with regards to sex abuse in the world. We have Catholic Priests molesting children, child sex slaves in many countries and abductions all over the place. It is hard to say if there is more of this lately or if indeed the media realizes that people are very upset with it all?

Recently in an online forum think tank a gentleman got a little carried away with all this and discussed that all this sex abuse in the world is not directly related to the Clinton-Lewinsky situation, but the Abu Grave scandal. In fact he stated:

“Sex Abuse and Mind Control Starts at the Top” and “If you take the time to verify (do your own searches) you will agree that Monica was a PG scandal, whereas, this is XXXXXXXXXXXX+”

Of course after stating this he tried to re-direct everyone to his Blog where he really got into some real conspiracy type stuff, way over the top. So another member of the online group challenged him on his claims and how he tied all this in with the Abu Grave Scandal. The other think tanker asked:

“Are you implying that the Monica Lewinsky, was peanuts compared to the Abu Grave Prison events? If so, why do you say that? The Abu Grave thing appeared to be an issue of psychological warfare on those imprisoned to break down their self esteem and build them back up in order to entice them to give us information, as perhaps an interrogation process. That backfired due to the media and was probably a less than tactful event, similar perhaps to the Monica Lewinsky event, also far less than tactful and quite frankly none of my business. May I ask what your point is here? There is a section on this website which discusses prison abuse. Yet you are making statements in anonymity and these statements of yours are s

forum think tank a gentleman got a little carried away with all this and discussed that all this sex abuse in the world is not directly related to the Clinton-Lewinsky situation, but the Abu Grave scandal. In fact he stated:

“Sex Abuse and Mind Control Starts at the Top” and “If you take the time to verify (do your own searches) you will agree that Monica was a PG scandal, whereas, this is XXXXXXXXXXXX+”

Of course after stating this he tried to re-direct everyone to his Blog where he really got into some real conspiracy type stuff, way over the top. So another member of the online group challenged him on his claims and how he tied all this in with the Abu Grave Scandal. The other think tanker asked:

“Are you implying that the Monica Lewinsky, was peanuts compared to the Abu Grave Prison events? If so, why do you say that? The Abu Grave thing appeared to be an issue of psychological warfare on those imprisoned to break down their self esteem and build them back up in order to entice them to give us information, as perhaps an interrogation process. That backfired due to the media and was probably a less than tactful event, similar perhaps to the Monica Lewinsky event, also far less than tactful and quite frankly none of my business. May I ask what your point is here? There is a section on this website which discusses prison abuse. Yet you are making statements in anonymity and these statements of yours are

a was a PG scandal, whereas, this is XXXXXXXXXXXX+”

Of course after stating this he tried to re-direct everyone to his Blog where he really got into some real conspiracy type stuff, way over the top. So another member of the online group challenged him on his claims and how he tied all this in with the Abu Grave Scandal. The other think tanker asked:

“Are you implying that the Monica Lewinsky, was peanuts compared to the Abu Grave Prison events? If so, why do you say that? The Abu Grave thing appeared to be an issue of psychological warfare on those imprisoned to break down their self esteem and build them back up in order to entice them to give us information, as perhaps an interrogation process. That backfired due to the media and was probably a less than tactful event, similar perhaps to the Monica Lewinsky event, also far less than tactful and quite frankly none of my business. May I ask what your point is here? There is a section on this website which discusses prison abuse. Yet you are making statements in anonymity and these statements of yours are

>

“Are you implying that the Monica Lewinsky, was peanuts compared to the Abu Grave Prison events? If so, why do you say that? The Abu Grave thing appeared to be an issue of psychological warfare on those imprisoned to break down their self esteem and build them back up in order to entice them to give us information, as perhaps an interrogation process. That backfired due to the media and was probably a less than tactful event, similar perhaps to the Monica Lewinsky event, also far less than tactful and quite frankly none of my business. May I ask what your point is here? There is a section on this website which discusses prison abuse. Yet you are making statements in anonymity and these statements of yours are

backfired due to the media and was probably a less than tactful event, similar perhaps to the Monica Lewinsky event, also far less than tactful and quite frankly none of my business. May I ask what your point is here? There is a section on this website which discusses prison abuse. Yet you are making statements in anonymity and these statements of yours are somewhat attacking. Not so sure this is a viable way to approach topics on a think tank, are you? Why are you doing this? Are you a staunch Democrat and wish to slander the current leadership or The United States of America? Why? I do not believe anyone condones the public sexual humiliation of those Muslim Abu Grave prisoners caught on film in sex acts of their own free will. Those pictures should never have been made public.”

You can imagine how the debate continued to get rather aggressive and how both sides quickly came to an impasse. Needless to say the poster of the original comment was asked to back up his story and verify his facts. But he could not. Do you have a more viable explanation for all the sex abuse issues on the news and in our society and around the world? If so, let’s hear them. Think on this in 2006.