death, a huge event. After death we become isolated from this earthly life, and vise versa. Then we face procedures after death, like judgment followed by a life containing reward or punishment or both according to the judgment. The judgment is done by the Super-power with the data collected from our life on earth. So a life full of thrilling events starts after death.”

When and a

In our modern life we depend on scientific concepts to serve our practical purpose. We see people die and experience death in vitro. But to have a clear idea about death as a significant event we have no specific guideline from science till now. This does not stop us from facing this significant event. Thus as a rule of nature, we nurture some concept about death that serves our practical purpose.

The most trusted and elaborate information about death comes from the religions we practice. Even these concepts are followed in the very practical purposes like burial or funeral. So in the absence of any guide line from the science, religion guides us. There are multiple religious concepts about death with different elaborations. For the practical purpose I want to discuss the average and comprehensive pattern of idea given in most of the religions. Also avoiding the details, I will discuss the main stem of the concept. I believe that will be acceptable for most of the readers too.

There are concepts in religions that conclude death as some end by merging with nature, and nothing more. Other concepts are there that describe death as an event before a defined life. From my point of view, as I’m talking adaptation here, the later variety of concept seems more comprehensive, though scientific elaboration unavailable in both the instances.

So what is the pattern that describes our life longer even after death? If we describe grossly about the pattern, then it should be like – “We live our life on earth. Some reason causes our death, a huge event. After death we become isolated from this earthly life, and vise versa. Then we face procedures after death, like judgment followed by a life containing reward or punishment or both according to the judgment. The judgment is done by the Super-power with the data collected from our life on earth. So a life full of thrilling events starts after death.”

When and a

l purpose.

The most trusted and elaborate information about death comes from the religions we practice. Even these concepts are followed in the very practical purposes like burial or funeral. So in the absence of any guide line from the science, religion guides us. There are multiple religious concepts about death with different elaborations. For the practical purpose I want to discuss the average and comprehensive pattern of idea given in most of the religions. Also avoiding the details, I will discuss the main stem of the concept. I believe that will be acceptable for most of the readers too.

There are concepts in religions that conclude death as some end by merging with nature, and nothing more. Other concepts are there that describe death as an event before a defined life. From my point of view, as I’m talking adaptation here, the later variety of concept seems more comprehensive, though scientific elaboration unavailable in both the instances.

So what is the pattern that describes our life longer even after death? If we describe grossly about the pattern, then it should be like – “We live our life on earth. Some reason causes our death, a huge event. After death we become isolated from this earthly life, and vise versa. Then we face procedures after death, like judgment followed by a life containing reward or punishment or both according to the judgment. The judgment is done by the Super-power with the data collected from our life on earth. So a life full of thrilling events starts after death.”

When and a

cuss the average and comprehensive pattern of idea given in most of the religions. Also avoiding the details, I will discuss the main stem of the concept. I believe that will be acceptable for most of the readers too.

There are concepts in religions that conclude death as some end by merging with nature, and nothing more. Other concepts are there that describe death as an event before a defined life. From my point of view, as I’m talking adaptation here, the later variety of concept seems more comprehensive, though scientific elaboration unavailable in both the instances.

So what is the pattern that describes our life longer even after death? If we describe grossly about the pattern, then it should be like – “We live our life on earth. Some reason causes our death, a huge event. After death we become isolated from this earthly life, and vise versa. Then we face procedures after death, like judgment followed by a life containing reward or punishment or both according to the judgment. The judgment is done by the Super-power with the data collected from our life on earth. So a life full of thrilling events starts after death.”

When and a

ore a defined life. From my point of view, as I’m talking adaptation here, the later variety of concept seems more comprehensive, though scientific elaboration unavailable in both the instances.

So what is the pattern that describes our life longer even after death? If we describe grossly about the pattern, then it should be like – “We live our life on earth. Some reason causes our death, a huge event. After death we become isolated from this earthly life, and vise versa. Then we face procedures after death, like judgment followed by a life containing reward or punishment or both according to the judgment. The judgment is done by the Super-power with the data collected from our life on earth. So a life full of thrilling events starts after death.”

When and a

death, a huge event. After death we become isolated from this earthly life, and vise versa. Then we face procedures after death, like judgment followed by a life containing reward or punishment or both according to the judgment. The judgment is done by the Super-power with the data collected from our life on earth. So a life full of thrilling events starts after death.”

When and as we follow these religions, we claim no objection against the information provided. Also the average religious ones claim and guarantee about their belief in religion and information provided in religion. Also very practical and important events, after some near one’s death, are done very much according to the religious guideline. From these events it seems very apparent that the confidence in religion about death is pretty strong and natural in us.

But on the other hand, things that we do in times other than the deaths of our near ones raise question about the extent of belief we have in what we perform and claim to believe. For example, if we really believe in judgment, our activities on earth will have defined moral guideline and that should also be followed by us. More simply, though we say about many events in the grave after death, do we ever try to hear the sounds of those events sitting beside any grave? It’s true that religion might describe those events as not perceivable, but do we show or seem to have the minimum curiosity about the events in the grave? I believe, the answer is no for most of us.

So in one hand we claim and perform very much according to the religion, on the other hand we posses some patterns of behavior that are totally mismatch in the presence of true belief or knowledge. Thus a question can easily asked, where are we? Science leads us to nothing about death, religions lead us to some point, but we don’t seem to be with the concept truly.

Thus, it is my claim that we are truly ambiguou