for directories. Otherwise don’t include them. This would only enhance their customer’s experience by saving them precious time and aggravation. It could even be a marketing point.

Google claims to be a democratically controlled search engine, with links equating to votes for particular web pages. Yet unannounced changes in their ranking structure have wreaked havoc on many a small Internet entrepreneur. The danger with democracies is that the customers can vote with the

Not so long ago in the beginning of the internet age the search engine function of the major portals was seen as a necessary evil to help drive customers to profitable areas of the business. Does anyone remember the Go Network? The companies that forgot why customers went to the portal in the first place were the first ones to go out of business. There is a solid business adage that says you must take care of and grow your core business first and only support ancillary businesses that compliment and enhance your core business.

Most users of search engines are either searching for information or shopping. These users are the core customers of the search engine. The primary function they demand of the search engine is good search results. If the search engine is considered the aggregator of search results, why would expect secondary aggregators to get the best results in our search.

If I am a restaurant owner and I am searching for “restaurant supplies” and my search results are filled with directories for restaurant supplies, why not go to the directories first. Is the search engine really doing its job if the results turn out secondary results. Then I must do a second search in the directory to find my desired result.

Why are these directories ranking so high in the search engine results. If the suspected algorithms that Google uses to rank web pages show that links truly are the determinant factor in assigning page rank, this would explain the result. Explaining the reason for the result still doesn’t explain the logic that leads to directories being so prevalent in the results.

Would it not benefit the search engine, if it were to be your directory of choice? If you do not to put the word directory in your search, I would safely assume that you were not looking for a directory. Search engines could satisfy the needs of the directories by having a separate search just for directories. Otherwise don’t include them. This would only enhance their customer’s experience by saving them precious time and aggravation. It could even be a marketing point.

Google claims to be a democratically controlled search engine, with links equating to votes for particular web pages. Yet unannounced changes in their ranking structure have wreaked havoc on many a small Internet entrepreneur. The danger with democracies is that the customers can vote with the

es that compliment and enhance your core business.

Most users of search engines are either searching for information or shopping. These users are the core customers of the search engine. The primary function they demand of the search engine is good search results. If the search engine is considered the aggregator of search results, why would expect secondary aggregators to get the best results in our search.

If I am a restaurant owner and I am searching for “restaurant supplies” and my search results are filled with directories for restaurant supplies, why not go to the directories first. Is the search engine really doing its job if the results turn out secondary results. Then I must do a second search in the directory to find my desired result.

Why are these directories ranking so high in the search engine results. If the suspected algorithms that Google uses to rank web pages show that links truly are the determinant factor in assigning page rank, this would explain the result. Explaining the reason for the result still doesn’t explain the logic that leads to directories being so prevalent in the results.

Would it not benefit the search engine, if it were to be your directory of choice? If you do not to put the word directory in your search, I would safely assume that you were not looking for a directory. Search engines could satisfy the needs of the directories by having a separate search just for directories. Otherwise don’t include them. This would only enhance their customer’s experience by saving them precious time and aggravation. It could even be a marketing point.

Google claims to be a democratically controlled search engine, with links equating to votes for particular web pages. Yet unannounced changes in their ranking structure have wreaked havoc on many a small Internet entrepreneur. The danger with democracies is that the customers can vote with the

rant supplies” and my search results are filled with directories for restaurant supplies, why not go to the directories first. Is the search engine really doing its job if the results turn out secondary results. Then I must do a second search in the directory to find my desired result.

Why are these directories ranking so high in the search engine results. If the suspected algorithms that Google uses to rank web pages show that links truly are the determinant factor in assigning page rank, this would explain the result. Explaining the reason for the result still doesn’t explain the logic that leads to directories being so prevalent in the results.

Would it not benefit the search engine, if it were to be your directory of choice? If you do not to put the word directory in your search, I would safely assume that you were not looking for a directory. Search engines could satisfy the needs of the directories by having a separate search just for directories. Otherwise don’t include them. This would only enhance their customer’s experience by saving them precious time and aggravation. It could even be a marketing point.

Google claims to be a democratically controlled search engine, with links equating to votes for particular web pages. Yet unannounced changes in their ranking structure have wreaked havoc on many a small Internet entrepreneur. The danger with democracies is that the customers can vote with the

signing page rank, this would explain the result. Explaining the reason for the result still doesn’t explain the logic that leads to directories being so prevalent in the results.

Would it not benefit the search engine, if it were to be your directory of choice? If you do not to put the word directory in your search, I would safely assume that you were not looking for a directory. Search engines could satisfy the needs of the directories by having a separate search just for directories. Otherwise don’t include them. This would only enhance their customer’s experience by saving them precious time and aggravation. It could even be a marketing point.

Google claims to be a democratically controlled search engine, with links equating to votes for particular web pages. Yet unannounced changes in their ranking structure have wreaked havoc on many a small Internet entrepreneur. The danger with democracies is that the customers can vote with the

HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
<a href="http://www.diggitup.net/article/77824/diggitup-Yahoo-Smashes-Google-For-You-And-Me.html">Yahoo Smashes Google For You And Me</a>

BB link (for phorums):
[url=http://www.diggitup.net/article/77824/diggitup-Yahoo-Smashes-Google-For-You-And-Me.html]Yahoo Smashes Google For You And Me[/url]

Related Articles:

The Psychology Of Starting A Small Business Online

Your head is going to have to be very clear for you to win online. Crystal clear. Here's a few other pointers you may want to keep in mind.

Money Making Offers -Tip for Successful Advertising Campaign

Most people fail at marketing money making offers and opportunities. There is a right and wrong way to work it. Choose the right way and you could be an overnight success, choose the wrong way and you could end up in the poorhouse.

Find Your PPC Niche

Show you how to get the best out of your PPC campaing by finding your niche. By avoiding or reducing the amount of highly competitive keywords you bid for, you can dramatically increase your return on investment.

Bookmark it: